Obama’s Revenge

Once upon a time, a white teenager from Kansas got pregnant by her black Kenyan boyfriend, Barack Obama Sr., or was it her husband? Whatever. (I say whatever because we’ve never seen either marriage or divorce certificates). Some say the couple was in Kenya visiting relatives when the birth of their son, Barack Obama Jr., occurred. No matter. (I say no matter because we’ve never seen an authentic birth certificate). By the time the baby was two years old his father abandoned him for his other wife and child in Kenya.

I wonder how toddler Barry felt when his father left him, and never reappeared until a single time when the boy was 10. Bewildered? Sad? Lonely? Angry? What do two-year-olds do with those feelings?

It didn’t take long for Barry’s mother to meet and marry an Indonesian native named Lolo Soetoro. They moved to Indonesia, where her child became Barry Soetoro, took on Indonesian citizenship, and was presumably schooled in public, Christian, and Muslim schools. (I say presumably because we’ve never seen those school records). But when Barry was 10 years old, his mother sent him back to the U.S. to be raised by her parents, Madelyn and Stanley Dunham, although she kept her baby daughter Maya Soetoro with her.

I wonder how the by-now fully-sentient young Barry felt when his mother sent him packing. Sad? Jealous of the baby who remained behind with mommy? Confused and dizzy by the disparate cultures – languages, customs, foods, sights, sounds, schooling – he had experienced? Resentful? What did Barry do with those feelings?

By the time he was 10, the boy had been abandoned three times – by his father, stepfather, and mother. And although he was raised by his white grandparents in Hawaii – where “people of color” were not his color – he found out soon enough that his mixed-race background rendered him, in effect, an outsider. Did that make him feel self-conscious, indignant, victimized?

But he wasn’t altogether an outsider. In Hawaii, young Barry met Frank Marshall Davis, his first and perhaps most influential mentor. The infamous Marshall, a Communist activist (and self-confessed pedophile) taught Barry – was it Obama, Soetero, Dunham? – that white people were the devil incarnate and that blacks were the most “victimized” people on earth.

Yet the abandoned and rejected child was lucky. His white-devil grandparents gave him a comfortable life in Hawaii, and an education that apparently qualified him to attend several prestigious schools – Occidental College in CA, Columbia Univ. in NY City, and Harvard Law School in Cambridge, MA.(I say apparently qualified because we’ve never seen any of his college transcripts).

read the rest...

In Canada spies are us

H/T Canada Free Press
by Judi McLeod, Canadafreepress.com
January 26, 2005

Operation Sidewinder. It sounds like a Hollywood spy movie starring Harrison Ford.

For a long time, Sidewinder moldered on the shelf as just another conspiracy theory.

In reality, Sidewinder was a controversial report put together by a small but hard-working team of RCMP and CSIS (Canadian Security & Intelligence Service) officials.

It was Sidewinder that sounded the first alarm bells that China is one of the greatest ongoing threats to Canada’s national security and Canadian industry.

But even after Sidewinder was side swiped by former Prime Minister Jean Chretien, intelligence proves that there is no doubt that an active Chinese Intelligence Service has been able to gain influence on vital sectors of the Canadian economy, including real estate, high technology and security. The bottom line is that this unprecedented influence gave China ongoing access to economic, political and some military intelligence in Canada.

Operation Sidewinder met with a fate that silenced ringing alarm bells. Officially entitled Chinese Intelligence Services and Triads Financial Links in Canada, it was buried. Following orders from persons unknown, CSIS watered down Sidewinder’s worrisome conclusions and replaced it with a revised document called, Echo.

CSIS officials maintain that they buried Sidewinder because it relied on nothing more than conspiracy theories--even though http://www.asianpacificpost.com heralded the news in August 2003 that some 3,500 Chinese spy companies had been identified operating in Canada and the United States.

While CSIS claimed that conspiracy caused them to go mum, other intelligence sources are saying that political pressure forced CSIS to abandon the Sidewinder report.



Read on...

Maybe this will finally be Obama's undoing.

Barack Obama -- Did the Illinois senator violate the Logan Act.

Yuri Bezmenov- If this doesn't scare you, nothing will

Having watched this video, it explains the LEFT in Canada to a tee. Watch and then lay over the ideology and plans Liberals, NDP and greens have in store for us. This is Coming to fruition as we speak and has been slowly creeping upon us since Trudeau was in power.

Yuri Bezmenov
Uploaded by onmyway02

Revealed: British plan to build training camp for Taliban fighters in Afghanistan

H/T The Independent/UK

If this is accurate, it is another in a string of recent extremely disturbing trends coming out of Britain in the last week or so. It would appear that the new British PM is hell bent on capitulating to the defacto new Islamic rulers of Britain.

By Jerome Starkey in Kabul
Monday, 4 February 2008

Britain planned to build a Taliban training camp for 2,000 fighters in southern Afghanistan, as part of a top-secret deal to make them swap sides, intelligence sources in Kabul have revealed. The plans were discovered on a memory stick seized by Afghan secret police in December.

The Afghan government claims they can prove British agents were talking to the Taliban without permission from the Afghan President, Hamid Karzai, despite Gordon Brown's pledge that Britain will not negotiate. The Prime Minister told Parliament on 12 December: "Our objective is to defeat the insurgency by isolating and eliminating their leaders. We will not enter into any negotiations with these people."

The British insist President Karzai's office knew what was going on. But Mr Karzai has expelled two top diplomats amid accusations they were part of a plot to buy-off the insurgents.

The row was the first in a series of spectacular diplomatic spats which has seen Anglo-Afghan relations sink to a new low. Since December, President Karzai has blocked the appointment of Paddy Ashdown to the top UN job in Kabul and he has blamed British troops for losing control of Helmand.

It has also soured relations between Kabul and Washington, where State Department officials were instrumental in pushing Lord Ashdown for the UN role.

President Karzai's political mentor, Sibghatullah Mojaddedi, endorsed a death sentence for blasphemy on the student journalist Sayed Pervez Kambaksh last week, and two British contractors have been arrested in Kabul on, it is claimed, trumped up weapons charges. The developments are seen as a deliberate defiance of the British.

An Afghan government source said the training camp was part of a British plan to use bands of reconciled Taliban, called Community Defence Volunteers, to fight the remaining insurgents. "The camp would provide military training for 1,800 ordinary Taliban fighters and 200 low-level commanders," he said.

The computer memory stick at the centre of the row was impounded by officers from Afghanistan's KGB-trained National Directorate of Security after they moved against a party of international diplomats who were visiting Helmand.

A ministry insider said: "When they were arrested, the British said the Ministry of the Interior and the National Security Council knew about it, but no one knew anything. That's why the President was so angry."

Details of how much President Karzai was told remain murky. Some analysts believe Afghan officials were briefed about the plan, but that it later evolved.

The camp was due to be built outside Musa Qala, in Helmand. It was part of a package of reconstruction and development incentives designed to win trust and support in the aftermath of the British-led battle to retake the stronghold last year.

Read the rest...

Shadow Warriors on WMD in Iraq

Shadow Warriors on WMD in Iraq

From Human Events.

Kenneth Timmerman’s new book, Shadow Warriors: The Untold Story of Traitors, Saboteurs, and the Party of Surrender, is a potent assault on the enemy within. The late great U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Jeanne Kirkpatrick once reflected upon her role in the war against the Communist bloc and its sycophants by remarking, “We understood that our words were weapons.” Now, in a world where ubiquitous Internet-bound words penetrate every private salon from Tehran to Manhattan’s Upper East Side, Timmerman has detonated a rhetorical bunker buster.
___________________________________________________________________________________

Thanks to an unprecedented four-year propaganda offensive, most Americans have concluded that Saddam Hussein’s Iraq had no relationship with al Qaeda and that it had no programs aimed at developing chemical, biological or nuclear weapons. Timmerman easily eviscerates this version of conventional wisdom by quoting King Abdullah II of Jordan, who, on April 17, 2004, informed the world that his intelligence agency foiled a plot by al Qaeda to bring in from Syria 20 tons of Iraqi-made sarin gas and detonate it in the capital city of Amman. Estimates were that it would have killed 20,000 people, seven times 9/11, and eliminated the American embassy as well. It was stunning evidence that Iraq had not only moved stockpiles of WMD to Syria before the invasion but that the remnants of Saddam’s regime retained an operational link to al Qaeda. “It was a major, major operation,” King Abdullah said. “It would have decapitated the government.”

Some passages in Shadow Warriors take on the aspect of a John LeCarre Cold War thriller. For example, the book makes public for the first time reports that were sent to Deputy Undersecretary of Defense John Straw (one of the book’s few good guys) by a British spy, Stephen, a self-styled “Lawrence of Arabia,” who was on the ground inside Iraq in the weeks prior to the U.S.-led invasion and who saw the evacuation, cleanup and transportation of WMD stockpiles and production equipment. Stephen was able to observe the operation being conducted by non-uniformed Russian special forces (Spetsnatz) who loaded the drums of chemicals and biotoxins on huge 18-wheelers and shipped them to destinations inside Syria and Lebanon. Amazingly, Stephen’s network was so good that he was able to track the shipments to specific villages in Syria or to hospitals in Beirut and, in some cases, even to the specific doctor who received the drums. Straw also got corroborating reports of the Russian evacuation operation directly from the Ukrainian head of intelligence, Gen. Ihor Smeshko, whose agency refused to work with the CIA or any conventional U.S. intelligence agencies for fear of leaks that would, in turn, result in great political peril. The Ukrainians reported to Straw that the former head of the KGB, Yevgeny Primakov, who had a long-standing business relationship with Saddam Hussein, headed up the WMD evacuation operation and even learned its code name, Sarandar (Russian for emergency exit).

While the true import of the Amman interdiction and the King’s statements went largely underreported by the Western media, it gives extra gravity to Timmerman’s thesis because it demonstrates just how treacherous are the shadow warriors—the Bush enemies who, for much of this decade, have sought to undermine the administration’s war effort from their shadowy positions inside the CIA, State Department, Justice Department, the media, congressional staffs and even the Pentagon. Among other things, the book makes clear that these shadow warriors have no moral standing, because they have been guilty of working to undermine a legitimate war, a war in which Iraq is only one theater and in which the West is pitted against a very lethal enemy.
__________________________________________________________________________________

Someone noted that running U.S. foreign policy has a level of difficulty roughly equal to that of playing chess in three dimensions. Many of Timmerman’s readers will likely wonder why Bush did not make use of the reports sent from the British spy Stephen, documenting the Russian WMD evacuations, or the reports from Gen. Georges Sada, the former head of the Iraq air force, who, after the fall of Baghdad, returned to his native land and interviewed numerous pilots who flew WMD’s into Syria.

Why would President Bush have wanted the information to be buried when it could have vindicated him after suffering such a massive propaganda offensive waged by the media and their allies, the shadow warriors? The question might be answered definitively only by future historians, but Shadow Warriors poses a chilling and timely theory—Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney thought the reason was Iran. “With Iran moving faster than anyone thought in its nuclear programs, the administration needed the Russians, the Chinese and the French, and was not interested in information that would make them look bad.”

Read More...

Political Correctness (PC) is a Socialist Scheme

From

The Canadian Sentinel

The Coming War Against Political Correctness
I just came across this piece and it got the old grey matter firing on all cylinders, so here's my latest post... my thoughts, direct to you, via the miracle of the blogosphere... just years ago, how on earth could I have done this? If anything's "progressive", I'd say it's technology, not social extremism!

Let's put an end to that cursed "progressive" Political Correctness fascism for once and for all in the military. This hardcore-leftist bullshit has absolutely no place whatsoever in our national defence and national security institutions, as it only weakens our countries, making us more of a bunch of paralyzed sitting ducks to be popped off by our enemies (and make no mistakes, we who know and understand the reality of the world know that we have enemies jealous of our success and great societies who wish to decimate, attack, defeat, occupy, convert, enslave and slaughter our populations).

Let's not limit our actions to eradicating that scourge of Political Correctness from our military and national security institutions only. Let's get rid of all Political Correctness altogether and return to the constitution-reigns-supreme democratic societies, based on JudeoChristian values (yes, it's true!) and once again be who we are without "progressive" fascist interference!

In fact, for our own domestic societies' sakes, we must discuss strategy, develop a blueprint and then declare and relentlessly wage and win a quiet war on that fascist, rights-robbing, constitution-ignoring menace of Political Correctness. Why? They are doing it to us, and are succeeding. They are taking away our constitutions, rewriting them, forcing their special preferences and ideologies upon everyone. They oppress and tyrannize us. They naturally will deny it (whether they know I'm right or whether they believe I'm wrong since they haven't been told by the MSM or their leadership that it's the truth) and try to fight back (and they will, and are quite formidable, powerful, well-funded and -organized opponents). But from now on we must hold our ground to take back our societies and our constitutions which guarantee in black and white our original, inalienable, eternal rights and freedoms.


Let me start the chariot rolling with a couple of points, which the Progressive Liberal Leftist Revolutionaries (PLLR) cannot possibly disprove:


There is, in reality, no such thing as "separation of church and state".

That concept is a complete left-wing fabrication repeated so much that even judges automatically believe it. In fact, David Kupelian, in his book, "The Marketing of Evil", which I'm reading now, proves it by going all the way back to the very naissance of the First Amendment, citing precise statements made by the Founding Fathers proving the real meaning of the wording of the "Establishment Clause", which has been massively distorted, turned upside down, reversed by ultra far leftwing PLLR militants. The Establishment Clause actually merely forbids Congress from making a law that would establish a national religion, period. The Clause prevents the state from interfering in the affairs of churches by creating a competing national religion, period! In fact, the very phrase, "separation of church and state" is not found anywhere in historical documents and is a complete fabrication, a Big Lie.

In fact, prior to the Constitution/Bill of Rights being signed by the states, thirteen States actually had a State religion and refused to sign the Constitution unless their freedom to worship however they see fit was protected from any and all interference, including by the national government. This, along with the historical documentation and true origin of the Establishment Clause, proves the original intent thereof. So when people tell us about "separation of church and state", tell them that there's no such thing, except coming from far-left subversives and in the minds of people who believe this Big Lie.

And, don't forget, the States cannot deviate from the national Constitution, either. Anyone who asserts otherwise is an accessory to the felonious, treasonous crime of Political Correctness.


It's also a Big Lie that our constitutions are "living documents".

They cannot be changed nor reinterpreted in any way, shape nor form. They are to be followed precisely unless amended precisely as they themselves indicate (and it's extremely hard to do this, like it would be to make an amendment to make it possible to allow the foreign-born Arnold Schwarzenegger to run for President... but don't be surprised if some PLLR "judge" deems that Arnie can indeed run, that the Constitution actually says he can!).

Any judge or other state apparatchik who deems something that doesn't adhere to our constitutions or which literally reinterprets them is a criminal guilty of high treason! As a matter of fact, constitutions were written to be understood by average people, not to be "reinterpreted" by self-deified "judges" hellbent on transforming society according to their ideologies. And this applies to the American, Canadian and all constitutions and rights documents.

The Left started this war.

It's ours to win, if we want to preserve our constitutions, our freedoms, democracies and rule of law.

After all, the Left is taking our enemies' sides AGAINST US. They brazenly, openly, treasonously favour our enemies!

posted by Canadian Sentinel at 3:52 PM

Canadian Sentinel

Canada Free Press

Jack-ama Bin-Layton

• Jack Layton of the Federal NDP, in his blathering against the government and the military is proving once again that he is a traitor to Canada.
  
  According to the Canadian Criminal Code:
  46(1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,
  
• (a) kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;
  
• (b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or
  
• (c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.
  
• (2) Every one commits treason who, in Canada,
  
• (a) uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;
  
• (b) without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;
  
• (c) conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph
  (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
  
• (e) conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.
  
  50. (1) Every one commits an offence who
  (a) incites or wilfully assists a subject of
  (i) a state that is at war with Canada, or
  (ii) a state against whose forces Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the state whose forces they are.
  
  By constantly undermining our Government and Military, Jack(ama) (Bin-)Layton is providing encouragement and comfort to our enemies and should be dealt with accordingly.